The research into the workings of Facebook’s algorithm has been limite by the lack of access to its proprietary inner workings . It’s not enough to investigate the effects of changes to Facebook’s News Fee. I think it’s important to understand Algorithmic transparency Tool why this happene and to examine Facebook’s business decisions and their impact on democracy more directly.
A recent look at the company’s internal processes shows that Facebook is beginning to understand the extent of its power . In July 2019. The Bloomberg News reveale that the company had deploye software on its own platform to search for posts that portraye Facebook itself in potentially misleading ways . The reucing their visibility to protect the company’s reputation.
Some international legal experts
have begun calling for laws to protect democracies from the possibility that algorithmic oil and gas email list manipulation could generate electoral victories. There is no evidence that Facebook’s changes were politically motivate.
To guard against this risk
New laws could prohibit any changes to the algorithm during periods why do wish marathons have so many positive reviews? leading up to elections . In the financial sector. The for example. The ” quiet periods ” preceing major company announcements are intende to prevent marketing and public relations efforts from artificially influencing stock prices.
Similar protections for algorithms against corporate manipulation could help ensure that mobile lead politically active . The power-seeking executives at Facebook —or any other company with significant control over . A users’ access to information—cannot use their systems to shape public opinion or voting behavior.
This post was originally publishe in English on The Conversation and c mobile . Algorithmic transparency Tool lead transparencyrepublishe on Meta-Meia with permission.
