You get a lot of information from people who just read the headline of a news story and didn’t check it.” – Cristiana Google Unlike Facebook and WhatsApp. The Google contains fewer explicit signals about what people think about the information they encounter there. In contrast. The other features of the platform were particularly highlighte when users describe how they consume information there. Participants often referre to Google ‘s ranking of content as an important indicator of quality. Typically preferring the top results overall the others.
For example for Sukumar
It’s a priority to find something at the top of the list. But you tend to go down base on bybit database your time and interest in the topic in question .he who controls the frame controls the conversation For some users. The Google rankings are viewe with distrust and skepticism about the way the search engine choosesTypically preferring the top search results. The which may have commercial interests. Respondents often describe information on Google as more trustworthy than on other platforms.
This favorable perception of Google ‘s
trustworthiness is rather relate to the way Google allows users to easily compare multiple sources of information at once. “Well. The Google has a lot of different news outlets. The so… in that sense. The I think it’s like Apple News. The which has Typically preferring the top a lot of different news outlets. The so I think it’s good to have. The yeah. The it’s good to read a range of things because you can get a more balance view.
” Audiences with little interest in news are therefore expose to limite Typically preferring the top content – in terms of depth – on sale lead platforms. The for which they exercise rapid judgment. Beyond the way in which information is processe and presente on meia websites.
